TLDR
Seattle defendant Cordell Goosby was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the 2023 killing of pregnant restaurateur Eina Kwon and the wounding of her husband, and will be held in a state psychiatric hospital under Washington court supervision.
A downtown Seattle shooting that killed a pregnant restaurant owner and her unborn child has ended, at least legally, without a prison sentence. Instead, the man who fired the shots has been ordered into psychiatric custody. The case illustrates how Washington handles rare insanity verdicts in homicide cases.
On June 13th, 2023, 34-year-old Eina Kwon and her husband, Sung Kwon, stopped their white Tesla at a red light in downtown Seattle while driving to their restaurant, Aburiya Bento House. According to charging documents, Cordell Goosby approached the driver’s side window and opened fire, killing Eina, fatally injuring the couple’s unborn child, and wounding Sung.
A Downtown Killing and Immediate Arrest
Prosecutors wrote that Goosby sprinted toward the car, raised a gun, and in seconds emptied the weapon into the vehicle, then ran from the intersection and discarded the firearm. In court papers cited by Fox News, they said his actions “left a family and community shattered.”
Police officers later found Goosby nearby. According to the same court documents, he raised his hands and said, “I did it! I did it!” before being taken into custody. He was charged with first-degree murder and first-degree attempted murder, and records indicate he was barred from owning a firearm because of a criminal history in Illinois, with officials alleging the gun used was stolen.
Experts Conclude Legal Insanity
As the case moved toward trial, the central question shifted from what happened at the intersection to Goosby’s mental state at the time of the shooting. Under Washington law, a defendant is legally insane if, because of a mental disease or defect, they were unable to understand the nature and quality of their act or to know that it was wrong when it occurred.
According to Fox News, mental health experts for both the defense and the prosecution examined Goosby and independently concluded that he met the legal definition of insanity at the time of the shooting. With both sides’ experts aligned, the court permitted a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity rather than sending the case to a jury on the original murder and attempted murder charges.
What Commitment Means After an Insanity Verdict
An insanity verdict does not operate like a standard acquittal. The King County court system, as reported by Fox 13 Seattle, explains that a not guilty by reason of insanity ruling means the defendant “admits that he committed the crimes and agrees to commitment in a state psychiatric hospital.” In other words, the act is not in dispute, but criminal responsibility is.
Following the ruling, Goosby was ordered to a secure state hospital for treatment. According to Fox 13 Seattle, any future release would require approval from multiple state and court entities, typically including hospital clinicians, a state review board, and a judge. That process can result in continued confinement, conditional release with strict supervision, or, less commonly, eventual discharge if authorities agree that the person no longer poses a danger.
For the Kwon family and the broader community, the case concludes without a prison term but with an open-ended commitment in the mental health system. From here, the key decisions will unfold not in a criminal trial, but in periodic reviews that balance treatment progress against public safety concerns.
References
