AdobeStock 300416677

Wisconsin Nurse Amputates Patient's Leg Without Consent

By Emmanuel Tredway • Aug 27, 2025

Imagine a nurse, entrusted with the care of vulnerable patients, making a decision so shocking it blurs the lines between medical care and ethical failure. This is the unsettling story of Mary K. Brown, who worked at a Wisconsin nursing home and reportedly admitted to amputating a patient's frostbitten foot without consent or a doctor's order. The incident, which took place in May 2022, has left many questioning the boundaries of medical authority and the safeguards meant to protect patients.

The Incident That Shook a Community

Mary K. Brown was working at the Spring Valley Senior Living and Healthcare Campus in Spring Valley, Wisconsin, when she reportedly amputated the foot of a patient suffering from severe frostbite. The patient, identified as 62-year-old Doug McFarland, had been admitted earlier that year after a fall at home, which led to frostbite so severe that both his feet became necrotic. However, there is conflicting information about which foot was amputated — some sources say it was the left foot, while others report it was the right. Regardless, Brown reportedly performed the amputation without permission from the patient or his doctors.

Court documents obtained by local ABC affiliate KSTP show that Brown referred to the patient's condition in a way that suggested the feet were severely damaged and decayed, and she believed amputating one foot would improve his quality of life. However, this decision was reportedly made unilaterally, without any medical authorization or patient consent. According to Law & Crime, colleagues at the facility confirmed that the patient still had both feet on the morning of May 27, 2022, but by that night, one was missing. The amputation was only discovered after the fact, raising serious concerns about oversight and communication within the nursing home.

A Chilling Twist: The Taxidermy Joke

Adding a macabre layer to this already disturbing case, Brown reportedly joked about preserving the amputated foot in her family's taxidermy shop. According to a nurse who spoke with investigators, Brown said "she was going to preserve the foot and put it on display with a sign that said, 'Wear your boots kids,'" as reported by PEOPLE. This grim quip has become a haunting symbol of the case, highlighting a disturbing disconnect between professional responsibility and personal detachment.

Legal Consequences and Plea Deal

Initially charged with physical abuse of an elderly person, mayhem, and negligent abuse of a patient, Brown pleaded "no contest" to a misdemeanor charge of negligent abuse. Her nursing license was reportedly suspended after the charges were announced. The more serious felony charges were dropped as part of the plea agreement. She was fined $443 and is barred from working as a caregiver in any capacity, as reported by Nurse.org. Brown will not serve jail time, a resolution that some may find surprising given the severity of the case and the fact that the patient reportedly died days after the unauthorized amputation.

According to Law & Crime, the nursing home's administrator acknowledged that Brown was instructed not to amputate the foot without a doctor's order but believed she intended to ensure the patient's comfort. However, the lack of proper authorization and the failure to report the incident raised serious questions about the facility's internal controls and patient safety protocols.

Medical Overreach and Ethical Failure

This case is a stark example of medical overreach — when a healthcare professional exceeds their authority or acts outside accepted medical standards. Brown's decision to amputate without consent or a doctor's order not only violated legal and ethical boundaries but also betrayed the trust placed in her by the patient and the healthcare system.

Hospice care, by its nature, focuses on comfort and dignity in a patient's final days. Yet, amputating a foot without consent, especially when the patient reportedly experienced pain during the procedure, contradicts these principles. One nurse present during the amputation said the patient held Brown's hand tightly and moaned, while another nurse reported that the patient later said he felt everything and that it was very painful, according to PEOPLE.

What This Means for Patient Safety

You might wonder how such a breach could happen in a regulated healthcare environment. The case exposes vulnerabilities in nursing home oversight, communication, and accountability. The fact that the patient's medical chart had missing entries on the day of the amputation and that the incident was not immediately reported suggests systemic issues that go beyond one individual's misconduct, as reported by Nurse.org.

For families and patients, this case is a chilling reminder to stay vigilant about the care their loved ones receive. It underscores the importance of clear communication, proper consent, and strict adherence to medical protocols. Healthcare facilities must ensure that staff understand the limits of their authority and that any deviations are promptly reported and investigated.

Reflecting on Justice and Accountability

While Brown's no-contest plea and the resulting penalties may seem lenient given the circumstances, the case highlights the complexities of prosecuting medical misconduct. The dismissal of felony charges and the absence of jail time might leave you questioning whether justice was fully served.

However, the relinquishment of Brown's nursing license and the financial penalty send a message about the consequences of such actions. It also opens the door for regulatory bodies to review and strengthen policies to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Final Thoughts

The story of Mary K. Brown and her patient is a sobering tale of trust broken and boundaries crossed. It challenges us to think critically about the safeguards in place to protect the most vulnerable among us and the ethical responsibilities of those entrusted with their care.

As you reflect on this case, consider the delicate balance between medical judgment and patient rights. It's a reminder that even in the most challenging circumstances, respect, consent, and transparency must never be compromised.

If you or a loved one is navigating care in a nursing home or hospice setting, don't hesitate to ask questions, seek second opinions, and advocate for clear communication. After all, in healthcare, vigilance can be a powerful shield against tragedy.

References: Nurse who amputated foot without permission changes plea | Nurse Who Cut Off Patient's Foot Without Permission Avoids Jail, Felony Charges Dropped | Wis. Nurse Pleads No Contest to Amputating Man's Foot Without His Permission | Wisconsin nurse pleads not guilty to amputating man's foot | Sister of man whose foot was allegedly amputated by Wisconsin nurse speaks out

The Truthfully team was assisted by generative AI technology in creating this content
Trending